OPAC - Pencarian Artikel Jurnal & Majalah Library USD

Menampilkan semua artikel (Halaman 791 dari 34166, Total: 341652 data)

Pendidikan Nilai di Perguruan Tinggi

Pengarang : -
Nama Majalah/Jurnal : Ilmu dan Budaya
Volume / Edisi : VII-4 , JANUARI (No. 4)
Halaman : 268-272
Abstrak : -

Kualitas Manusia Yang Diperlukan dalam Pembangunan Kebudayaan

Pengarang : Mattulada
Nama Majalah/Jurnal : Ilmu dan Budaya
Volume / Edisi : VII-4 , JANUARI (No. 4)
Halaman : 263-267
Abstrak : -

Ilmu Politik di Universitas Nasional

Pengarang : -
Nama Majalah/Jurnal : Ilmu dan Budaya
Volume / Edisi : VII-4 , JANUARI (No. 4)
Halaman : 255-262
Abstrak : -

A Field Trial Of Bendiocarb (OMS-1394) As A Space Spray Againts Aedes Aegypti Near Jakarta, Indonesia

Pengarang : -
Nama Majalah/Jurnal : Ilmu dan Budaya
Volume / Edisi : VII-4 , JANUARI (No. 4)
Halaman : 248-254
Abstrak : -

Menyambut Perayaan Tahun Pemuda Seluruh Dunia Dengan Sumpah Pemuda Baru

Pengarang : -
Nama Majalah/Jurnal : Ilmu dan Budaya
Volume / Edisi : VII-4 , JANUARI (No. 4)
Halaman : 241-247
Abstrak : -

What is it to discipline a child: What should it be? A reanalysis of time-out from the perspective of child mental health, attachment, and trauma.

Pengarang : Dadds, Mark R.; Tully, Lucy A.
Nama Majalah/Jurnal : American Psychologist
Volume / Edisi : 74 (No. 7)
Halaman : 794-808
Abstrak : Parental discipline strategies are a necessary and critical aspect of positive child development. Their qualities confer risk versus protection for the development of mental health problems. Time-out from positive reinforcement is now one of the most common and well-researched discipline procedures across the world, with overwhelming evidence to support its efficacy and acceptability. It has also recently attracted considerable criticism from writers evoking child well-being considerations based on attachment theory. The main concern is that the removal of a child to time-out exposes the child to a break in attachment security and, for children with trauma histories, potentially causes harm. Here, we consider what a discipline strategy should be from a mental health perspective and, utilizing the best available models of developmental mental health and psychopathology, derive five axioms for judging and guiding the worth and acceptability of any particular discipline strategy. We then use these axioms to evaluate and specify how time-out can be used in a way that maximizes positive child outcomes, and then review its use with children who have experienced complex trauma. We show that time-out, when conceptualized and enacted consistently with contemporary models of learning, attachment, self-regulation, and family systems theory, is actually a positive perturbation to these systems that can rapidly remediate problems the child is experiencing, and thereby generally enhances child well-being. Clinical, research, and policy implications are briefly discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Revisiting theory on research use: Turning to policymakers for fresh insights.

Pengarang : Bogenschneider, Karen; Day, Elizabeth; Parrott, Emily.
Nama Majalah/Jurnal : American Psychologist
Volume / Edisi : 74 (No. 7)
Halaman : 778-793
Abstrak : Social science has done well in providing empirical studies that depict how research is used in policymaking. Yet it performs less well in another contribution science can make—developing explanatory theoretical frameworks that predict and promote future research use. To address this theoretical void, onsite studies of policymakers have been called for. In this qualitative study, semistructured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 123 legislators in 2 states, 32 legislators nominated by colleagues as exemplar research users, and 13 key informants. Policymakers’ reports of 14 contributions that research makes to policymaking are compared to the predictions of four prominent theories of research utilization, which are representative of four categories of theories that examine the interface between researchers and policymakers—the politico-administrative decision-making model, a typology of research use; community dissonance theory; and policy agenda-setting/multiple-streams theory. The eight research contributions most frequently mentioned by policymakers cut across policymakers, political party, and states with varying degrees of partisan polarization. In some respects, policymakers’ perceptions were well-aligned with theory, such as the contributions research makes to individual considerations (e.g., informing, explaining, and justifying one’s positions), and to policy issue considerations (e.g., defining issues; designing legislation). Yet other contributions were seldom predicted by theory, such as the contributions research makes to policymakers’ relationships (earning the trust of colleagues; educating others) and the policy process (asking important questions; enhancing debate, dialogue, collaboration, and compromise). Policymakers report that these contributions of research provide both policy and political benefits. Implications are drawn for advancing theory on research utilization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

Scientific imperatives vis-a-vis growing inequality in America.

Pengarang : Kirsch, Julie A.; Love, Gayle D.; Radler, Barry T.; Ryff, Carol D.
Nama Majalah/Jurnal : American Psychologist
Volume / Edisi : 74 (No. 7)
Halaman : 764-777
Abstrak : A landmark article published in the American Psychologist (Adler et al., 1994) encouraged psychologists to engage in research on socioeconomic inequality and health. Numerous contributions followed to fill in psychosocial and behavioral pathways. Specifically, we review advances on health inequalities research from a large public-use study (Midlife in the United States [MIDUS]). The Great Recession of 2007 to 2009 and its lingering effects are then reviewed to underscore widening inequality in access to education, employment, and income. Two MIDUS national samples of same-aged adults recruited 2 decades apart are then compared to assess historical changes in socioeconomic, physical health, and well-being profiles from the 1990s to postrecession. Despite historical gains in educational attainment over time, we show that indicators of socioeconomic status, health, and well-being are more compromised in the postrecession sample relative to the 1990s sample. Building on these preliminary findings, we elaborate opportunities for further inquiry by the scientific community to examine whether widening socioeconomic inequalities exacerbated by the Great Recession translate to widening health inequalities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

The socioecological psychology of upward social mobility.

Pengarang : Oishi, Shigehiro; Koo, Minkyung; Buttrick, Nicholas R.
Nama Majalah/Jurnal : American Psychologist
Volume / Edisi : 74 (No. 7)
Halaman : 751-763
Abstrak : Intergenerational upward economic mobility—the opportunity for children from poorer households to pull themselves up the economic ladder in adulthood—is a hallmark of a just society. In the United States, there are large regional differences in upward social mobility. The present research examined why it is easier to get ahead in some cities and harder in others. We identified the “walkability” of a city, how easy it is to get things done without a car, as a key factor in determining the upward social mobility of its residents. We 1st identified the relationship between walkability and upward mobility using tax data from approximately 10 million Americans born between 1980 and 1982. We found that this relationship is linked to both economic and psychological factors. Using data from the American Community Survey from over 3.66 million Americans, we showed that residents of walkable cities are less reliant on car ownership for employment and wages, significantly reducing 1 barrier to upward mobility. Additionally, in 2 studies, including 1 preregistered study (1,827 Americans; 1,466 Koreans), we found that people living in more walkable neighborhoods felt a greater sense of belonging to their communities, which is associated with actual changes in individual social class. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

Transdisciplinary team science for global health: Case study of the JUS Media Programme.

Pengarang : Ferguson, Gail M.; Fiese, Barbara H.; Nelson, Michelle R.; Meeks Gardner, Julie M.
Nama Majalah/Jurnal : American Psychologist
Volume / Edisi : 74 (No. 6)
Halaman : 725-739
Abstrak : The world’s most pressing health problems, such as the childhood obesity pandemic, demand creative new solutions. In this article it is argued that psychological theories, concepts, and methods are ripe for integration with those of other disciplines to synthesize innovative transdisciplinary global health solutions. As a model, the process of blending developmental and cross-cultural psychology with health and media sciences to develop a transdisciplinary intervention for youth and families in Jamaica—the J(amaican and) U(nited) S(tates) Media? Programme—is described. Jamaicans on the island are being inundated by the inflow of U.S. media, and those who have internalized U.S. culture and become “Americanized” via a process called remote acculturation are especially vulnerable to negative health habits promoted by U.S. media and advertising. In response, the JUS Media? Programme teaches critical thinking skills about food advertising (especially U.S.-produced) to decrease unhealthy eating among Americanized youth and families in Jamaica. In this article, first, transdisciplinarity is defined and distinguished from other scientific orientations (uni-, multi-, and interdisciplinarity) using the evolution of scholarship within JUS Media? Programme’s transdisciplinary team as an example. Next, the application of transdisciplinary team science to global health problems is explained. As an example, the guiding transdisciplinary model for the JUS Media? Programme is described, and the cultural adaptation process used to design the JUS Media? Programme for Jamaican families is detailed. Finally, there is a reflection on best practices for transdisciplinary team leadership and collaboration. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
← Back to HOME