| Nama Pengarang | : | - |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
| Volume / Nomor Edisi | : | - |
| Nomor Halaman | : | 344-367 |
| Abstraksi Narasi | : | The influence of teachers’ qualifications on their teaching practice has been subject to debate. Literature reviews do not settle these debates, partly because the literature is uneven and partly because reviews capture only narrow slices of literature. In particular, many reviews eliminate qualitative studies. Yet without examining qualitative evidence, variations in quantitative findings are difficult to interpret, disappointing findings are difficult to understand, and plausible explanations of patterns are in short supply. The present review focuses on qualitative studies and compares their findings with those from quantitative literature. The author finds that the qualitative literature agrees with quantitative literature in its inability to distinguish between teachers with different types of certificates or different teacher education backgrounds. On the other side, the author finds more evidence of benefit from content knowledge than quantitative studies have typically found. The qualitative studies also reveal competing influences and offer hypotheses about why the outcomes look the way they do. |
| Nama Pengarang | : | Borman, Geoffrey D., Dowling, N. Maritza, Schneck, Carrie, Kennedy, Mary M., Stein, Marc L et al., Boyd, Donald et al. |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
| Volume / Nomor Edisi | : | - |
| Nomor Halaman | : | 389-407 |
| Abstraksi Narasi | : | In this article, the authors report achievement outcomes of a multisite cluster randomized field trial of Open Court Reading 2005 (OCR), a K–6 literacy curriculum published by SRA/McGraw-Hill. The participants are 49 first-grade through fifth-grade classrooms from predominantly minority and poor contexts across the nation.Blocking by grade level within schools, the trial includes 27 classrooms receiving the OCR curricular materials and professional development and 22 "business-as-usual" control classrooms. Multilevel analyses of classroom-level effects of assignment to OCR reveal statistically significant treatment effects on all three of the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills, 5th edition, Terra Nova literacy posttests. The OCR effect sizes are d = 0.16 for the Reading Composite, d = 0.19 for Vocabulary, and d = 0.12 for Reading Comprehension. These effects achieved across 27 classrooms and 5 schools demonstrate the potential for replicating improved literacy outcomes through the scale-up of OCR. |
| Nama Pengarang | : | - |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
| Volume / Nomor Edisi | : | - |
| Nomor Halaman | : | 255-280 |
| Abstraksi Narasi | : | This article evaluates changes in racial and ethnic composition of three Texas universities following the ban on affirmative action imposed by the 1996 Hopwood decision. The authors estimate the extent to which universities practiced affirmative action before the ban and evaluate how officers at these universities responded by changing relative weights accorded to various applicant characteristics. After assessing whether changes in the relative weights favored minority applicants, the degree to which these new policies succeeded in maintaining minority shares at their pre-Hopwood levels is simulated. This article finds that these universities complied with the Hopwood ruling such that direct advantages given to Black and Hispanic applicants disappeared (and in some cases became disadvantages). Although there is some evidence that universities changed the weights they placed on applicant characteristics in ways that aided underrepresented minority applicants, these changes were insufficient to restore Black and Hispanic applicants’ share of admitted students. |
| Nama Pengarang | : | - |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
| Volume / Nomor Edisi | : | - |
| Nomor Halaman | : | 281-315 |
| Abstraksi Narasi | : | This study examines 4 years of small school reform in Chicago, focusing on schools formed by converting large traditional high schools into small autonomous ones. Analyzing systemwide survey and outcome data, the authors assess the assumptions embedded in the reform’s theory of change. They find that these schools are characterized by more collegial and committed teacher contexts and more academically and personally supportive student contexts. There is some evidence of decreased dropout rates and increased graduation rates for the first cohort of students but not for the second cohort. The authors do not find stronger instruction, nor do they find student achievement has improved. They discuss implications for reformers and policy makers who are interested in small schools in particular and high school refo |
| Nama Pengarang | : | - |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
| Volume / Nomor Edisi | : | - |
| Nomor Halaman | : | 203-235 |
| Abstraksi Narasi | : | Policy makers increasingly include provisions aimed at fostering professional community as part of reform initiatives. Yet little is known about the impact of policy on teachers’ professional relations in schools. Drawing theoretically from social capital theory and methodologically from qualitative social network analysis, this article explores how district policies influence teachers’ social networks in eight elementary schools in two districts involved in the scale-up of mathematics curriculum. It is argued that policy affects whom teachers seek out for discussion of mathematics instruction but that differences in policy provisions lead to variations in the nature and quality of interactions. Furthermore, school leaders mediate district policy, thereby influencing these patterns of interaction. By uncovering the dynamics by which policy influences teachers’ social networks, this article contributes to understandings of the factors that foster the development of social capital. It also uncovers opportunities for intervention for those designing policy initiatives to support implementation of instructional innovations. |
| Nama Pengarang | : | Bruce Keith, Josipa Roksa, Cynthia E. Coburn, Jennifer Lin Russell, Joseph E. Kahme et al., Mark C. Long, Marta Tienda |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
| Volume / Nomor Edisi | : | - |
| Nomor Halaman | : | 236-254 |
| Abstraksi Narasi | : | While state legislatures are increasingly enacting articulation policies, research to date provides little evidence that these policies enhance students’ likelihood of transfer. Based on a careful historical review of state statutes, the authors propose that articulation policies do not improve transfer rates because that is not their intended purpose; the main goal of articulation policies is to prevent the loss of credits when students transfer within state higher education systems. Subsequently, the authors use the National Education Longitudinal Study to evaluate articulation policies based on an alternative set of outcomes: attainment of a bachelor’s degree, time to degree, and credits required to complete a bachelor’s degree. They discuss the limitations of existing data and propose that future studies be designed to specifically evaluate the transfer or loss of credits applicable toward general education requirements. |
| Nama Pengarang | : | - |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
| Volume / Nomor Edisi | : | - |
| Nomor Halaman | : | 111-140 |
| Abstraksi Narasi | : | This study uses Early Childhood Longitudinal Study data to investigate the importance of three general aspects of teacher effects—teacher background qualifications, attitudes, and instructional practices—to reading and math achievement gains in first grade. The results indicate that compared with instructional practices, background qualifications have less robust associations with achievement gains. These findings suggest that the No Child Left Behind Act’s "highly qualified teacher" provision, which screens teachers on the basis of their background qualifications, is insufficient for ensuring that classrooms are led by teachers who are effective in raising student achievement. To meet that objective, educational policy needs to be directed toward improving aspects of teaching, such as instructional practices and teacher attitudes. |
| Nama Pengarang | : | - |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
| Volume / Nomor Edisi | : | - |
| Nomor Halaman | : | 141-180 |
| Abstraksi Narasi | : | Ability grouping is sometimes thought to exacerbate inequality by increasing achievement gaps; however, ability grouping may in fact benefit a fast growing and often marginalized student population: children from non-English-speaking home environments. The level-appropriate, small-group instruction received in reading ability groups may be particularly beneficial to these language-minority children, who are not regularly exposed to English at home. Focusing on Hispanics, who make up the majority of language-minority students, the author examined this hypothesis through difference-in-differences estimation techniques in a hierarchical linear model framework. Ability grouping in reading during kindergarten was significantly associated with greater benefits for language-minority Hispanic students relative to other students. However, this benefit faded during the summer and first grade, unless grouping continued in first grade. These findings are robust to alternative specifications and suggest that differentiated instructional strategies upon school entry may be an effective, relatively low cost tool to combat the achievement gap faced by a fast growing segment of students. |
| Nama Pengarang | : | - |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
| Volume / Nomor Edisi | : | - |
| Nomor Halaman | : | 181-200 |
| Abstraksi Narasi | : | This article exploits highly detailed data on teacher absences from a large urban school district in the northern United States to shed light on the determinants and effects of teacher absences. The topic is important because both school and district policies can influence teachers’ propensity to be absent. The authors estimate the impact of teacher absences on academic achievement of students matched to elementary school teachers. Models include fixed effects for teachers to control statistically for potential correlation between time-invariant levels of teachers’ skill and effort and their rates of absence. The authors estimate 10 additional days of teacher absence reduce mathematics achievement of fourth-grade students by 3.2% of a standard deviation. They employ an additional instrumental variables strategy to bolster the case for a causal interpretation of results. Instrumental variables results indicate the impact of unexpected teacher absences on student achievement is larger than the impact of anticipated absences. |
| Nama Pengarang | : | Darling-Hammond, Linda, Julian Vasquez Heiling, Willett, John B., Murnane, Richard J., Raegen T. Miller, Joseph P. Robinson, Russell W. Rumberger, Darling-Hammond, Linda, Willett, John B., Murnane, Richard J., Gregory J. Palardy, Julian Vasquez Heiling, Joseph P. Robinson, Raegen T. Miller |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
| Volume / Nomor Edisi | : | - |
| Nomor Halaman | : | 75-110 |
| Abstraksi Narasi | : | This study examines longitudinal student progress and achievement on the elementary, middle, and high school levels in relation to accountability policy incentives in a large urban district in Texas. Using quantitative analyses supplemented by qualitative interviews, the authors found that high-stakes testing policies that rewarded and punished schools based on average student scores created incentives for schools to "game the system" by excluding students from testing and, ultimately, school. In the elementary grades, low-achieving students were disproportionately excluded from taking the high-stakes Texas Assessment of Academic Skills tests, demonstrating gains not reflected on the low-stakes Stanford Achievement Test–Ninth Edition. Student exclusion at the elementary level occurred through special education and language exemptions and missing scores. Furthermore, gaming strategies reduced educational opportunity for African American and Latino high school students. Sharp increases in 9th-grade student retention and disappearance were associated with increases in 10th-grade test scores and related accountability ratings. |
Unduh Dokumen Berkas PDF Utama