OPAC - Pencarian Artikel Jurnal & Majalah Library USD
Menampilkan semua artikel (Halaman 345 dari 34170, Total: 341698 data)
Toward a dialectic relation between the results in CSCL: Three critical methodological aspects of content analysis schemes
klik untuk membaca file PDF
| Pengarang | : | Alfian Lains |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning |
| Volume / Edisi | : | 5 (No. 1) |
| Halaman | : | 117-136 |
| Abstrak | : | The research field of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) includes a large variety of approaches which present significant theoretical and methodological differences. This diversity complicates the articulation of the knowledge that is produced within this investigative framework. The paper addresses this problem from a dialectic view. We propose that the main reason for this problem is not the theoretical and methodological diversity itself, but rather the difficulty of situating one specific result within this diversity in a way that makes dialectic relations between results visible and mutual transformation of the approaches possible. In the present paper, we propose a set of indicators, applicable to content analysis approaches, aimed to facilitate this reciprocal positioning of the results in the field. These indicators come from what we term “critical methodological aspects”: those aspects of the methodological infrastructure that are directly related to theoretical positions. We consider three critical methodological aspects in content analysis schemes: the units of analysis, the relations to be established, and the dimensions of analysis. Indicators regarding these aspects are proposed and defined, and their use for facilitating dialectical relations between results is exemplified by means of the examination of five specific approaches. |
RRC SEBAGAI NEGARA PENGHASIL MINYAK
| Pengarang | : | Soesastro Hadi .M |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Analisa |
| Volume / Edisi | : | III-4, APRIL (No. 4) |
| Halaman | : | 13-34 |
| Abstrak | : | - |
School Site to Museum Floor: How informal science institutions work with schools
| Pengarang | : | - |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | International Journal of Science Education |
| Volume / Edisi | : | 29 (No. 12) |
| Halaman | : | 1489-1507 |
| Abstrak | : | Two research studies sponsored by the Centre for Informal Learning and Schools (CILS) investigated the programmes informal science institutions (ISIs) currently provide to support K–12 science education, particularly in the area of teacher professional development (PD). The first study was a large?scale survey with 475 ISIs responding about the programmes they offer schools and teachers beyond one?day field trips. A large majority of ISIs (73%) reported having one or more of these programmes, with more than one?half (59%) providing one or more forms of teacher PD. ISIs also reported a tendency for their programmes to be under?subscribed, and said funding was the biggest barrier to their ability to provide these programmes. A second study focused on ISI?based teacher PD programmes, looking at whom they serve, how they are funded, and their specific programmatic elements. This study also investigated the extent to which ISI?based PD incorporates features shown to produce measurable effects on teachers’ instructional practice. Researchers administered an intensive survey to over 310 ISIs with teacher PD offerings to obtain detail regarding the programming. The findings reported here indicate that the particular promise of ISI?based teacher PD is the potential to incorporate features of PD that have been shown by research to produce measurable effects on teachers’ practice. The results from these two studies suggest that while some opportunities may be missed to leverage the strengths of the ISIs’ learning environment in K–12 science education, ISIs continue to support K–12 science education in the United States in important and varied ways. |
The Value of “Dialogue Events” as Sites of Learning: An exploration of research and evaluation frameworks
| Pengarang | : | Jane L. Lehr |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | International Journal of Science Education |
| Volume / Edisi | : | 29 (No. 12) |
| Halaman | : | 1467-1487 |
| Abstrak | : | In the past five years, informal science institutions (ISIs), science communication, advocacy and citizen action groups, funding organizations, and policy?makers in the UK and the USA have become increasingly involved in efforts to promote increased public engagement with science and technology (PEST). Such engagement is described as taking place within the context of a “new mood for dialogue” between scientific and technical experts and the public. Mechanisms to increase PEST have taken a number of forms. One of the most visible features of this shift towards PEST in ISIs is the organization and staging of adult?focused, face?to?face forums that bring scientific and technical experts, social scientists, and policy?makers into discussion with members of the public about contemporary scientific and socioscientific issues related to the development and application of science and technology. A significant aspect of the literature on efforts to increase PEST has focused on the development of a unifying evaluative framework for determining what counts as success for PEST mechanisms, and how success (or lack thereof) can be empirically measured. In this article, we draw from our experiences as UK?based and US?based “dialogue event” practitioners and researchers/evaluators to suggest that these existing evaluative criteria are insufficient to explore the role and value of ISI?based “dialogue events.” Instead, we suggest that it may be productive to research and evaluate these ISI?based “dialogue events” as sites of learning. Secondly, however, we show through a discussion of our own research frameworks that understanding these “dialogue events” as sites of learning does not intuitively provide a framework for understanding what counts as success for these efforts. Instead, research on the role of “dialogue” within the educational literature—and the connections between “dialogue” and competing understandings of the nature of science and society—offers a multiplicity of approaches to defining the terms and goals of these events. Finally, we identify two broader implications of researching and evaluating these “dialogue events” as sites of learning for ISIs and all efforts to increase PEST. |
POLITIK DAN BAHAN-BAHAN MENTAH: TANTANGAN DUNIA MASA KINI DAN KONSEKWENSINYA BAGI KEBIJAKSANAAN-KEBIJAKSANAAN DOMESTIK
| Pengarang | : | Moertopo Ali |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Analisa |
| Volume / Edisi | : | III-4, APRIL (No. 4) |
| Halaman | : | 3-12 |
| Abstrak | : | - |
Tata Kelola Investasi Hijau dalam Memitigasi Adaptasi Krisis Iklim Daerah
| Pengarang | : | - |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Analisis CSIS |
| Volume / Edisi | : | 54 (No. 3) |
| Halaman | : | 319-347 |
| Abstrak | : | Krisis iklim memberikan pengaruh besar bagi masyarakat dan menimbulkan bencana ekologis. Untuk mengatasi krisis iklim ini tidak bisa dilakukan dengan cara yang biasa, tetapi melalui program mitigasi- adaptasi skala nasional dan pembangunan rendah karbon sebagai bagian dari tujuan Indonesia Emas 2045 dan target nol emisi di tahun 2060. Investasi hijau menjadi salah satu upaya pemerintah untuk bertransformasi dalam pembangunan yang lebih lestari, sekaligus instrumen untuk mecapai pembangunan berkelanjutan dan mencegah limit to growth. Implementasi investasi hijau ini tentu membutuhkan tata kelola pada pemerintah pusat dan daerah baik dari sisi perencanaan, penganggaran, kebijakan dan kelembagaan yang nampaknya belum menjadi perhatian di level pusat dan daerah, Dalam studi ini dipetakan faktor pendukning dan penghambat implementasi investasi hijau dalam mitigasi-adaptasi krisis iklim. Adapn?n aktor yang memiliki peran penting penerapan investasi hijau dalam analisis stakeholders dibagi dalam empat kuadran. Stakeholders yang masuk dalam kuadran pertama (kekuasaan tinggi dan kepentingan tinggi) adalah Kementerian Investasi, Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan, Kementerian Investasi, Kementerian ESDM, Kementerian Lingkangan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah, Dinas Penanaman Modal Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu, Dinas yang membidangi urusan perindustrian, Dinas yang membidangi urusan lingkungan hidup dan Dinas yang membidangi urusan Energi. Aktor yang masuk dalam kuadran kedua (kekuasaan tinggi dan kepentingan rendah) adalah Kemendagri, Kemenko Perekononian dan Kemenko Maritim dan Investasi. Aktor yang masuk. dalam kuadran ketiga (kekuasaan rendah dan kepentingan tinggi) adalah niasyarakat sipil, pelaku usaha, media massa dan Seknas SDGs Indonesia. Terakhir aktor yang masuk dalam kuadran empat (kekuasaan rendah dan kepentingan rendah) tidak ada pemangku kepentingan yang masuk. Dalam kuadran ini. |
Kartelisasi Partai Politik dan Erosi Demokrasi dalam Koalisi Pemilihan Presiden 2024 di Indonesia
| Pengarang | : | Pande Radja Silalahi |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Analisis CSIS |
| Volume / Edisi | : | 54 (No. 2) |
| Halaman | : | 261-291 |
| Abstrak | : | Penelitian ini mengkaji fenomena kartelisasi partai politik dan implikasinya terhadap erosi demokrasi dalam pembentukan koalisi Pemilihan Presiden (Pilpres) 2024 di Indonesia. Kartelisasi merujuk pada kecenderungan partai-partai politik terkooptasi dalam jaringan kepentingan elite dan negara, sehingga melemahkan fungsi representasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus, yang berfokus pada dinamika pembentukan koalisi dalam mendukung pasangan calon presiden. Adapun kajian ini didasarkan pada kerangka teori kartelisasi partai politik yang didukung dengan studi tentang demokrasi. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa Koalisi Indonesia Maju (KIM), yang mengusung pasangan Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming Raka, terbentuk bukan melalui kompetisi ideologis atau programatik, melainkan terbentuk karena konsolidasi elite, tekanan politik, dan pragmatisme partai. Proses ini juga diperkuat oleh pelemahan terhadap oposisi dan penyempitan rnang partisipasi masyarakat sipil. Akibatnya, Pilpres 2024 berlangsung dalam arena politik yang tidak bebas, tidak setara, serta minim kompetisi substantif sehingga menandai kemunduran dalam kualitas demokrasi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini memperkaya literatur tentang kartelisasi partai dan democratic backsliding dalam konteks sistem presidensialisme multipartai, serta menyoroti urgensi reformasi institusional. Diperlukan langkah konkret untuk memperkuat kedaulatan internal partai politik, merevisi presidential threshold, melindungi oposisi, serta membangun kembali mekanisme checks and balances yang efektif dalam sistem demokrasi Indonesia. |
Exploring whether students use of labelling depends upon the type of activity
| Pengarang | : | Bures, E.M., Abrami, P.C. & Schmid, R.F. |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning |
| Volume / Edisi | : | 5 (No. 1) |
| Halaman | : | 103-116 |
| Abstrak | : | This paper explores a labelling feature designed to support higher-level online dialogue. It investigates whether students use labels less often during a structured online dialogue than during an unstructured one, and looks at students’ reactions to labelling and to both types of tasks. Participants are from three successive course offerings of a Master’s-level course (n = 37). All students are allowed but not required to use a labelling feature which enables them to insert phrases such as “Building on your point” directly into their online messages. All students participate in two types of online activities in small groups—first an unstructured online dialogue, then a structured online dialogue. Students tended to use labels significantly less often during the structured dialogue: F(1, 36) = 5.950, p < 0.05. Sixty-two percent of students used the feature more than once during the unstructured dialogue compared to 46% during the structured dialogue. The maximum number of labels that a student used in the unstructured dialogue was 28 versus 16 in the structured dialogue. Students generally found the structured dialogue to be more interesting and relevant, and to have clearer expectations. Student reactions to the labelling feature were mixed: The mean of satisfaction was 18.35, SD = 3.88 (six items on a 5-point Likert scale). Students did not find labelling as useful during the structured dialogue: Perhaps labelling and the activity provided redundant scaffolding. These results imply that features built into the software should be implemented flexibly with thought to the other pedagogical scaffolds in the environment, particularly to the type of activity. |
MASALAH MODERNISASI MASYARAKAT TRADISIONAL
| Pengarang | : | - |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Analisa |
| Volume / Edisi | : | III-3, MARET (No. 3) |
| Halaman | : | 61-77 |
| Abstrak | : | - |
Polro Pasca Reformasi: Pelajaran Penting Meraih Kepercayaan Rakyat
| Pengarang | : | - |
| Nama Majalah/Jurnal | : | Analisis CSIS |
| Volume / Edisi | : | 54 (No. 2) |
| Halaman | : | 211-259 |
| Abstrak | : | Artikel ini bertolak dari refleksi mendalam atas perjalanan panjang Kepolisian Republik Indonesia (Polri) selama lebih dari tujuh dasawarsa. Sejak masih menjadi bagian dari Angkatan Bersenjata Republik Indonesia (ABRI), hingga menjadi institusi mandiri yang terpisab dengan Tentara Nasional Indonesia (INI), pelbagai masalah masih membayangi kelembagaan Polri, seperti: praktik korupsi, kejahatan ekologi, bisnis pengamanan, hingga pelanggaran bak asasi manusia (HAM). Di tengah surplusnya kewenangan dan dominannya peran Polri pasca reformasi, institusi ini terus mengalami defisit kepercayaan publik. Kepolisian profesional harapannya dapat tumbub seiring dengan berkembangnya demokrasi, akan tetapi kenyataannya justru seringkali jalan bersilang arah. Kini, Polri dituntut untuk dapat membayar kepercayaan publik dengan menunjukkan kinerja yang prediktif, responsibilitas, dan transparansi yang berkeadilan, senafas dengan jargon yang sejatinya melekat pada setiap insan bhayangkara. Artikel ini menguraikan analisis pelbagai catatan, masalah, dan tantangan yang dihadapi Polri dalam mewujudkan institusi kepolisian yang demokratis (democratic policing). Catatan tersebut, bersumber dari jejak bistoris pengalaman Polri menjalankanfungsi sebagai penjaga keamanan, ketertiban, dan pelayan masyarakat. |